![]() ![]() Technologies integrate better with sql server. You are probably going to be better off with sql server. Primarily use microsoft tools (c#/visual studio/reporting services) what really matters is how you are going to access theĭatabase and what you are going to do with it. Most comparisons you see are going to be feature checklists of no real The answers with meaningful support, not marketing fluff from Redmond. Store hundreds of millions of rows per table, and it handles these, too.Īsk more specific questions of your proposed vendor and have them back up Require fast read/write capability (which it has), others capability to I've been using postgres for more than a dozen years, and know that thereĪre a wide range of applications where it's the back end. ![]() Software? Do you need real-time transaction processing or as a lookup for What is the basis for "fast?" How does the dbms relate to the telephone Installed on that OS or on linux or the *BSDs. Support? While MS-SQL requires a Microsoft OS underneath it, postgres can be On what basis the comparisons are being made. > PostgreSQL, and others say the opposite. Some say that MSSQL is _much_ better/faster than > I'm in the process of buying a new telephony related software suite, and Test it for yourself.Ī Google search will turn up a lot of comparisons. Person for goodness sake, they're in it to sell you stuff, and aīigger price tag is better for them. But that could have just been because my server was betterĪnyway, both are reasonably good servers. Much, and I've converted a dozen or so MSSQL users to PostgreSQL justīy letting them connect to my db instead of theirs (think corporate I've only used MSSQL enough to know I don't really care for it that I don't tend to look to them for advice on I like cheerleaders, when they're in a uniform dancingĪround on the gym floor. or a sales person.Īnyone who judges one poorly while using only the other is aĬheerleader. It's probably much more important what you're running each on than theĪnyone who thinks pgsql is a toy is an idiot. > Maybe you guys are aware of some recent generic tests/comparisons > numbers, which actually should turn on quite a few alarms, come to > I've not been able to convince them to send me some actual benchmark > database is superior and finally a group who speaks highly of > systems are more or less equal, another group who says the Microsoft > people though are divided into three groups: One group says the two > PostgreSQL being a "toy compared to the Microsoft RDBMS". > sales-people all bang on about MSSQL being the superior choice, and > Microsoft solution because, well, they are a Microsoft shop. > The vendor is more or less indifferent, with a small plus to the > better/faster than PostgreSQL, and others say the opposite. > I'm in the process of buying a new telephony related software suite, > Anybody know of any recent comparisons made between the two?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |